Bad reporting on Gloucester “pact” pregnancies
Sometimes I feel like I’m in another journalism world. Reporting on sports is far different than crime, courts or many of the other venues we usually think of as “hard news.”
But today I read a story on Poynter Online that deals with “pack” journalism as it related to the Gloucester pregnancies story. This interested me because pack journalism is exactly what I do when I cover any sports from college on up.
And Poynter’s pereception on pack journalism was perfect.
Pack journalism has always been a risky proposition. These days, when so much news gets repeated without any independent verification, the flaws of pack journalism grow exponentially.
Adding to that, I would say that journalists right now are in a “I’ve got to break a big story to keep my job” mode. Which means that they are looking out for themselves more than the ideals that journalism is supposed to represent and uphold.
That’s when stuff starts getting dangerous.
The Poynter story lays out two big problems in the reporting of the Gloucester story by the big-time news outlets who came in after the initial reporting by the local paper.
First on their list was taking a source on his/her word, rather than finding a second one to back the information up. Journalism 101, really. In this case, it was the notion that these girls had made a “pact” to all get pregnant in high school.
One source – who wasn’t one of the actual girls – said it one time. Then it became a CNN headline.
Sources stay stuff all the time. A reporter’s job is to ask, “How do you know that?” rather than take them at their word. If that didn’t happen on the first level of reporting, it certainly should have triggered a more thorough review when that word “pact” was elevated to headline status.
Exactly.
The second mistake, of course, was that EVERY other news outlet reported the so-called pact without backing it up. It got so badly, and falsely, – and falsely – reported that the mayor of Gloucester had to deny the existence of the pact in a press conference.
Circling back to sports reporting, this kind of echoing happens all the time. When you have a dozen media outlets covering the same 45 players and a dozen coaches, there’s no other way to report but in a pack. And as former jocks, most of us, we have a competitive streak and hate to be beaten. When that happens, I see other sportswriters get downright sneaky and hateful toward each other.
The point is that as soon as it pops up on the competition’s blog, it’s on ours. We write first, investigate second.
It sucks, but sometimes that’s just the nature of the beast.
And, though it’ll come back to bite me I’m sure, I’m glad people like Poynter are out there to call us on it.
Great post.
Now why the fuck aren’t you out enjoying Hawaii?
RiSK
June 27, 2008 at 1:58 pm
Because I woke up at about 6 a.m. local time this morning in an airport hotel. My body said it was like 10 or whatever. I’m about to go eat breakfast right now, then on to our resort.
Ricky
June 27, 2008 at 2:11 pm
“It got so badly, and falsely, reported”
Let’s try to master basics like constructing sentences without multiple adverbs before we lecture the rest of the journalism business on the differences between good and bad journalism.
Mike
June 28, 2008 at 3:57 pm
ha! moderated comments! I’ll take 100-to-1 odds you’re the type of thin-skinned blogger who can dish it out but can’t take it.
Mike
June 28, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Nope, I’m just limiting my internet time because I’m on vacation. Otherwise you’re comments would’ve been posted yesterday.
If that’s what you got out of this post then you missed the big picture, Mike. This is a blog, which means I can construct my sentences however the hell I want to. And the use of multiple adverbs has nothing to do with good or bad journalism – bad writing, maybe, but not reporting.
So not only do you look stupid trying to copy edit a blog, you look like an ass for trying to say my use of multiple adverbs makes me unable to notice when bad reporting is taking place. One has nothing to do with the other.
Ricky
June 29, 2008 at 3:00 pm